Thursday, November 29, 2007

Whats Wrong With Fakku?

Love Actually The Last King of Scotland


TECHNICAL 1.FICHA

T. Original: The last king of Scotland

Address: Kevin Macdonald.
Starring: Forest Whitaker (Idi Amin), James McAvoy (Nicholas Garrigan), Kerry Washington (Kay Amin), Simon McBurney (Stone), Gillian Anderson (Sarah Merrit).
Writer: Peter Morgan and Jeremy Brock, based on the novel by Giles Foden.
Production: Andrea Calderwood, Lisa Bryer and Charles Steel.
Music: Alex Heffes .
Photography: Anthony Dod Mantle .
Editor: Justine Wright .
production designer, Michael Carlin .
Costume Michael O'Connor.
UK, 2006

2.SINOPSIS

For an amazing stunt of fate, a Scottish doctor high on medical mission in Uganda is irreversibly entangled with one of the most barbaric in the world: Idi Amin. Impressed by Dr. Garrigan's brazen attitude in a moment of crisis, the newly self-appointed president of Uganda, Amin, as he chooses as his personal physician and closest confidant. Though Garrigan feels at first flattered and fascinated by his new position, quickly open them eyes to Amin's savagery - and his own complicity in it.

The horror and betrayal chase Garrigan when you try to right his wrongs and escape Uganda alive.

3. WHY "The Last King of Scotland" is a film VOCATIONAL. NOTES FOR THE ENTERTAINER.

The Last King of Scotland, film adaptation of the novel by Giles Foden, is a great movie that brings us to the personal contradictions when it comes to doing good and we also hints at even lower what can humans. Two characters of special interest: Nicholas Garrigan, a Scottish doctor travels to Uganda after graduating and Idi Amin, who has just taken command of the country after a coup. It is the first who offers ideas for dealing with vocation, because in a way, we can identify with it. By contrast, the dictator Amin, we can help take a look at Africa and get to know the suffering of a people who have in their leaders their biggest problem. Anyway we can say that Nicholas is the true protagonist of the film and its position is used by the director to introduce the dictator. " The choice of actor James McAvoy to give life to Garrigan is most successful. Garrigan Amin does not judge but let it go, enjoying what is happening in his new position, as if it were a game. The bloody events will be shaping the figure of Amin, emphasizing his eccentric character, showing their anger attacks, and during the months some will be left That man next and close to that congenial Garrigan from the outset. " So what we said in Film Chufo aik ( http://www.cuak.com/?p=1131 )

We look for at the doctor Garrigan whose business card is as follows: " I continue with the idea of change things, fun, a little adventure and do something different "(especially if it is to enjoy the native in bed). These are his motivations for going as a doctor in Uganda. As is set in January 1971 do not look at this gesture and a commitment to solidarity with the poor was not then, but the young mind to break with the established and seeking new experiences and adventures of May is already 69. The fact that randomly choose their destination on a world map reflects this lack of references. It is therefore not surprising that Sarah, the wife of the doctor involved, he says it is not the best candidate for the job. However

could say that Nicholas Garrigan feels a call to do something for others. But he is so disoriented that they are wrong in the response. The origin of its drama and its error is in the answer given to Amin when he was offered the position of personal physician. This scene up the key to everything that comes later. Garrigan initially apologized to defraud doctors fearing the mission, and then responds with a " need to understand why I'm here ." But really he knows the reasons that have to be there? Amin believes that Sarah and he is carried away. So the next day and " given circumstances" (flattering, comfortable and active social life, personal friendship with the president ...) will take the job because he is "a good idea and the best way to be helpful to Uganda."

The problem is that Nicholas goes from doctor to be a personal confidant of the president, which shows not only how to operate certain rulers. The sympathy of all Scottish Amin is right and sufficient criterion for this rise, which borders on the ridiculous when he meets with ambassadors and businessmen.

From the Embassy of England, Garrigan is asked to open their eyes to the reality of the country shaken by the brutality of Amin. But our young doctor is unable to take a critical view of reality. Nicholas's defense makes the dictator and his naivete when he speaks of reality verging on pathetic. It is here getting more and more in a web of trust and betrayal till their hands and conscience stained with blood. When you go discovers she is trapped so much (even physically, in the embrace that gives Amin) they would be unable to escape. He will suffer mood swings of the dictator, who happens to say "you're just a doctor " to end begging " tell me what to do " passing of absolute trust to suspicion. Definitely, Nicholas Garrigan not know what their role or their role in everything that happens in the country. J. Rodríguez Chico www.labutaca.net says: "q ho came to the continent of air adventures with Don Juan and a blatant immaturity, gradually will face with the arbitrariness of his mentor, the consequences of their frivolous and irresponsible behavior, and death on the heels to moral dilemmas raised by order in life. "

He has lived in a bubble, as he accused the embassy official ( "Any idea what is happening in this country ?), Or as he himself says Amin at the end (death will first real thing that has happened ). And this is precisely the drama and the guilt of Nicholas Garrigan, his naivete, superficiality and lack of sensitivity. When people suffer, the gala festivities enjoys high society and amorous dalliances with women of the dictator. Something that will end up paying.

final film in a tough and powerful, Dr. Garrigan gets a new mission by the doctor who will give his life so he can tell the world the truth of what happened in Uganda. A truth that the West (we) close your eyes (repeat what he did "Garrigan?).

Overall we can say that this is not a film "African conflicts" that are beginning to abound in our billboards. You can throw in the face is a bit out of context, although there is some social conflict when England suggests the involvement of the entire plot. Moral Paul says that " The Last King of Scotland does not seek a history lesson on the genocide in Uganda, but evidence of the dangerous appeal of charismatic power and leaders motivated by megalomania and not for the good of their community . " Macdonald himself, the director says, " I saw it as a classic story about a young man begins looking for adventure, adventures live longer than he had expected and, in the process, find out who is actually ."

a bit to cover this gap, I offer this link where you can find a biography of the dictator Amin: http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2003/07/21/internacional/1058798361.html

How would you react against the seductive influence of power? Do you pray to him or just forget your own code moral to do? What if someone starts with good intentions and ends up being a bloodthirsty animal? These are the questions posed by the fascinating thriller The Last King of Scotland. Some topics vocations that can be seen are: decision making, personal fulfillment and to feel useful, the Justice social commitment, sensitivity / superficiality of social problems, motivation, insight ...

4.material FILM FOR WORKING

4.1.Vemos and analyze

- Who is Nicholas Garrigan at the beginning of the movie? Describes its characteristic features.

- What are their motivations, their dreams?

- What is taking decisions on the fly? Have you done a good insight?

-Le dictator Amin tells Garrigan that death will be the first real thing that has happened . What sense does this phrase?

- Do you think Garrigan has "served to Uganda?

- What vision of Africa offers the movie? Does it seem fair and appropriate?

- What do you most striking of Idi Amin?

4.2.Nos challenges

- What sensation, feeling, lets the movie?

- How do you identify with Nicholas Garrigan?

"Before the proposal of the senses, what would you do?

- How do you take the decisions important in your life?

- How your life and your decisions are affected by injustice and poverty in the world? What can you do to make your heart more sensitive and less blind to this reality?

- What did you know about Idi Amin?

- What gives you the knowledge of the existence of this dictator? What moves you to think and do?

4.3.Oramos

-appropriate songs and known by the group

-Prayer: LOVE ALL

Lord, teach us,

not love ourselves,

not only love our friends

love not only those who love us.

Teach us to think of others

and love, especially those

whom nobody loves.

Grant the grace to understand that

while we live a life too happy

there are millions of human beings,

are also your sons and brothers of ours,

starving,

dying of cold,

not have deserved to die of cold ...

Lord, have mercy on all

the world's poor.

And do not let

Lord,

we live happily alone.

Make us feel the anguish

of universal misery,

and deliver us from our selfishness. Amen.

( Raúl Follereau )

-Word of God: Jn 2:1-12. From the hand of Mary we learn to keep my eyes open and your heart sensitive to the needs of others.

-Poem

Do not you know that being around someone

can get sick or heal,

can make you live or die?

Do not you know that being around someone

can make you good or evil,

get sad or happy?

the absence of what someone can

take to die?

the arrival of what someone can

stay alive?

what someone's voice

can help the deaf to hear?

Do not you know that a word or a gesture

can teach the blind to see,

to see the meaning of his life in this world?

Do not you have time for someone

is the best medicine?

How times more effective than surgery

successfully?

Do not you know that only listen

someone can work miracles?

Do you already know all this?

And do not you know that the road between

knowing and doing,

between words and their implementation,

is long, really long?

( Wilhelm Willms )

-time for personal reflection, silence, and also to share in the light of the Word of God what is in our hearts after seeing the film, fears, contradictions, uncertainties, inconsistencies, spiritual blindness and insensitivity.

-Prayer: send me, Lord

Lord, when hungry,

send me someone in need of food.

When you're thirsty,

send me someone in need of drink.

When you cold,

send me someone in need of heat.

When you are upset,

send me someone to console.

When you can not with my cross,

let me share with another cross.

When I feel poor,

to share what I have to have less.

When you have time,

send me someone who can help a few minutes.

When you are discouraged,

me someone who can animate.

When I feel misunderstood,

me someone who needs understanding.

When you think only of myself,

draws my attention to the others.

( Blessed Teresa of Calcutta )

-Father

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Comments On Freed Pointe Shoes

The Incredibles


technical 1.Ficha

Original title: The Incredibles

written and directed by Brad Bird .

Country: USA.

Year: 2004.

Length: 121 min .

Gender: Animation, adventure.

original dub / English: Craig T. Nelson / José Antonio Ceinos (Bob Parr / Mr. Incredible), Holly Hunter / Beatriz Berciano (Helen Parr / Elastigirl), Samuel L. Jackson / Antonio Molero (Lucius Best / Frozone), Brad Bird / Emma Penella (Edna Mode), Elizabeth Peña / Esther Arroyo (Mirage), Spencer Fox / Miguel Rius (Dashiell 'Dash' Parr), Sarah Vowell / Laura Pastor (Violeta Parr), Jason Lee / Rafael Alonso (Buddy Pine / Syndrome), Teddy Newton / Carlos Herrera (Announcer), John Ratzenberger / Álex de la Iglesia (The Underminer).

Production: John Walker.

Executive Producer: John Lasseter.

Music: Michael Giacchino .

Photo: Janet the disposition of, Patrick Lin and Andrew Jimenez.

Editor: Stephen Schaffer .

production designer, Lou Romano .

Artistic Director: Ralph Eggleston .

2.Sinopsis

The Incredibles follows the adventures of a family of former superhérores they discover that the real source of his powers are ... in others. For one of the best in the world masked superhero Bob Parr (aka Mr.Increíble), fighting evil and saving lives was a daily occurrence. But now, fifteen years later, Bob and his wife (a former superherína on merit) have adopted civilian identities and lead a peaceful and secluded life with her three children on the outskirts of the city. Live like other mortals and lead a normal life with their children too, who leave them to look "Normal." Bob works at an insurance company where time sheet every morning and the only thing is trying to combat boredom and love handles that accumulate around your waist. This superhero is wishing for return to action. And finally, it presents an opportunity when he receives a mysterious statement so it points to a desert island with the intention of meeting a top secret mission. Now that the future of mankind hangs in the balance, the family must come together again and rediscover the charm of family life.

3. Why "The Incredibles" is a film career? Notes for the facilitator

This film is so well done that we can work with both children and adolescents as adults. This is one of its main virtues. The fundamental question I have to finish the viewing is that of identity. The family of superheroes before us does not know who they really are: "Are we superheroes endowed with special powers? "We are normal like the others? When and how to use superpowers? "

The superheroes were used to save lives. They were loved and respected by the general public. However, they are forced to live in hiding as "ordinary" after those they were saved file lawsuits against them for alleged damages. Underlying this is clearly a criticism of society's ingratitude towards popular idols.

monotony in this situation are our characters. In a world where evil still reigns they can not do good with their powers. It is the monotony of characters called to do great things. A frustrating monotony. Helen Parr appears to be the one best suited to this situation of social policy from its role as housewife. But Bob is working within a bureaucratic system that aims to make life difficult for policyholders of a company. Yearns for old days and "days of glory "carrying out the odd little adventure to kill the bug with his friend Lucius (formerly Frozone). But the contradictory situation in which they live becomes such that you lose your job in an expression of honesty and being tired of that system.

also identity crisis experienced by the children. The mother called to be like everyone else, but the truth is that nobody in this family is normal. Dash uses his powers to tinker Violet and her powers serve him to follow her boyfriend and hiding in her shyness. The family simply does not work, is in crisis.

protagonist's longing and yearning Bob put in danger when making a decision alone and unbeknownst to his wife. To discover the truth she feels overwhelmed by it and not know what to do, he has forgotten that it was Elastigirl and need someone to remember who he was and the powers still inside.

When you see the danger end everyone will learn to use his powers as a team. Each one contributes his own. Mr.Increíble thought he would end only with the fearsome enemy. But the threat is far greater than their resources. In his desire to protect the family (overprotection) is the risk of personal failure that lead to the destruction of the family and humanity. Even the baby, which was not known who had special powers, plays a role ultimately be essential to destroy the wicked.

Síndome The presence of any questions we face: the world is divided into superheroes and ordinary people? I think not. Precisely what you want to convey is that we all have superpowers, which are all original, and you have to know they used to serve the community / society and no one is so good (so incredibly good) that does not need others. Buddy Pine falls into the trap of wanting to be a copy of Mr.Increíble instead look if he had any power / special gift (maybe most do not know). From there, it starts a race to acquire powers artificially using others for their own purposes. But worst of all, it does not seek to serve and help humanity, but to be the best and therefore, to be admired and recognized by all. It is believed arrogant and indispensable.

One last point is given by the last scene of the film in which Dash is involved in a school competition. In this context he and his family know that using his powers would be an abuse and a way to humiliate others. One must know how to use the powers in the appropriate situation. The " go for the second " (instead of being champion) allowing another win, deserves our consideration. And that Bob is proud of his son.

The Incredibles is a film that praises the hero in an era of anti-heroes or to be a hero in the sense of serving the community doing good, is prohibited and frowned upon.

We can not ignore the way in which the director resolve the family crisis from his own experience as a husband and father, " For me, 'THE INCREDIBLES' (The Incredibles) is a story about a family that learns to combine his personal life with the love they have between them "says Bird. He adds: " is also a comedy about superheroes discovering their more human side. I wanted to create a world full of references to pop culture with typical devices that appear in the spy movies, the powers of the superhero comics and ill-using clever stuff, but I also wanted to create a story about family, albeit a family of superheroes. The truth is that I put all my heart in this story. All those things intimate-be husband, being a parent, the idea of \u200b\u200baging, the importance of family, which means work and how it feels to think you're losing things you love-appear in this great story .

JJM always offers us a very good review of this culling paragraph: " All this can be classed as a masterpiece, thanks to a script anthology that, after an impressive start, it takes time to define the main characters and achieve their dramatic and ethical conflicts. At this point stands the attractive view that the film offers family presented as the essential social nucleus, and in particular of sexual relations with children, always marked by an appealing combination of equality, love and demand. Anyway, perhaps the most original of the story is his social dissection suggestive, highly critical of the growing disregard for moral heroism in the film becomes prohibited, suspicious to scientific progress, without ethical standards and atractivísima in his exaltation of the virtues and its call for responsibility in the exercise of personal qualities. An excellent program for social renewal, which would vote millions of people around the world if I knew embody a political party " ( http://www.bloggermania.com/content/view/3929/2/ )

vocational issues we work on this film might be: personal qualities, self-awareness, personal identity , service, mission group / community.

4.material to work

film and analyze

4.1.Ver

- why superheroes are forced to live underground?

- what are the consequences of this situation each of the Parr family members?

- Why the Parr family is a family in crisis?

- Who is the main character?

"For you, what do you think is the message of the film?

4.2.Nos

challenges

- Which character do you most identify? Explain why.

- What are your best qualities or gifts?

- What do you do to share and make them available to others?

- Have you ever been a hero of good deeds? Tell us your story.

- You think it's easy to "get good and hero" in life?

- What experience have you had the value of the group over individual effort alone and isolated?

- How is the influence your family has had on your growth?

4.3.Oramos

-appropriate songs and known by the group "Prayer

SEND

LOCOS

Oh God! Us crazy

of those who undertake to fund

of those who forget themselves,

of those who love

with more than words,

of those who give their lives

truth and to the end. Give

crazy, crazy

,

passionate

men capable of making the leap to the insecurity, uncertainty

to

striking poverty

write crazy

accept diluted

mass unassuming erected a footstool

not use their superiority to their advantage. Give

crazy, crazy

present

love with a simple lifestyle,

liberating the proletariat efficient,

peace-loving,

pure consciousness,

determined never to betray,

able to accept any task,

to go anywhere,

free and obedient, spontaneous and persistent

,

sweet and strong. Give

crazy, Lord, give us crazy.

(LJ Lebret )

-Word of God Rom 12.1-8

Moment for reflection and communication and spontaneous prayer. It could encourage them to talk about the gifts they have received from God.

-Prayer:

NOT HAVE HANDS

Jesus, you have no hands. You

only our hands to build a world where justice prevails.

Jesus, you have no feet.

have only our feet

to implement freedom and love.

Jesus, you have no lips.

have only our lips to proclaim

the world the Good News to the poor.

Jesus, you have no media. You

our action only to ensure that we are all brothers.

Jesus, we are your Gospel

the only Gospel that people can read,

if our lives are effective words and deeds.

Jesus, give us your love and strength to continue

your cause and make yourself known to all who can.

-Poem:

IF WE MADE LOVE

If we do make love

shoulder to shoulder fatigue fatigue

and tear with tear.

If we did one.

each other.

next to each other.

Above gold and snow,

even beyond the gold and the sword.

If a block did not crack

with six billion

of red hearts that beat us ...

beautiful architecture which would rise from the mud!

(Angela Figuera Aymerich)

-Father

Thursday, November 8, 2007

Can An Sti Cause Acne

The Edukators


technical 1.Ficha

Original title: Die fette jahre sind vorbei

Director: Hans Weingartner

Cast: Daniel Brühl (Jan), Julia Jentsch (Jule), Stipe Erceg (Peter), Burghart Klaussner (Hardenberg)

Country: Germany

Year: 2004

Production: Hans Weingartner and Antonin Svoboda

Writer: Katharina Held and Hans Weingartner

Music: Andreas Wodraschke

Photo: Matthias Schellenberg, and Daniela Knapp

Editor: Dirk Oetelshoven and Andreas Wodraschke

Duration: 126 minutes

Genre: Drama

2. Synopsis

Jan, Peter and Jule are still young rebel. Are united in their passion to change the status quo. Jan channels his anger to fight against the unjust policies of the rich. It shares the same ideals with his roommate, Peter, but it more relaxed. Jule, Peter's girlfriend, just moving the same floor when you can not make ends meet on her salary as a waitress. Jule not know that Jan and Peter are "The Edukators", mysterious perpetrators of creative and non-violence which is dedicated to notify members of the yacht club that " your days of plenty are numbered ." But Jule has a secret: he had a car accident and was sentenced to pay a monthly sum to Hardenberg, a wealthy businessman. While Peter is on vacation, Jule and Jan take the opportunity to enter the town of Hardenberg and "educate." Among other things, they push the growing sentiment that unites them. When Jan and Jule return to the village the next night to pick up the phone that are left, Hardenberg surprises them. They have no choice but to call Peter for help, but they risk to discover their secret romance. The trio decides to kidnap the businessman and hide in the house that a relative is in the mountains. These young idealists must confront the values \u200b\u200bof the generation in power.

3. Why "The Edukators" is a film career? Notes for the entertainer.

This film is truly amazing for its theme and deep dialogue. Posed on the whole issue of the struggle for a new and better world through the lens of the new alternative social movements called "anti-globalization." While this is a concept that has many questions for some and as many suspicions to others, mainly due to small groups of violent, is no less true that the motto "another world is possible" leaves no one indifferent.

And this is The Edukators, how to build this new world. Is it a revolution? Should we kill the rich? How far do you have to be violent? What is the relationship between social and personal revolution? What are the passing years our ideals and dreams? These issues can lead to an ideological debate between one way or another to understand the world, its operation, especially economic liberalism and unbridled capitalism. A debate that could easily be talking about good and evil, seeing some as the solution to the problem they have caused others (simplicity where you can drop the film.) But it is a logical and necessary debate to address these issues of great interest to young people by idealism and his opposition to the adult world. But this kind of debate is the goal of our proposal. As is well known, we will focus on "vocational aspects" that can be traced in this film.

First we set the idealism of these two friends (Jan and Peter). What moves them is a desire of wanting to change the world. Are clearly not criminals or thieves. They have "principles." Not indifferent to the global injustice (against abuse are involved in the manufacture of branded shoes) or the injustice daily and close (the first scene on the bus). They have a dream (an ideology, if you will) and in a consistent way to act accordingly. Wanting to "educate" others merely reflects a desire to change others according to their way of seeing the world (here it is the argument). Despite the debate on means to reach this end is shown on the discrepancies that have the two friends.

Jule, meanwhile, also shares the ideals of his friends but at another level. Perhaps it is she who most directly suffer the injustice of the system. Work in a fancy restaurant where the customers are a ruthless snobbery (maybe a little exaggerated). He must also pay compensation of 94,000 € for a rich and wrecking the car in an accident involuntary. Lives locked up and enslaved in the system to "pay lifestyle a rich man." She only gets to express his rage and discontent verging cars from the clients (or boss).

After losing his job for "not having closed peak" and defend a friend, Jule ends up confessing: " not find anything you might think." To get there, Jule and Jen gave us a couple of interesting talks that begin with the testimony of Jule: " before wanted to have fun and be free. Then come the commitments. " From this conversation am extremely attention to the seduction of Jen capacity. Narrating what he does and why it does, does revive and awaken the spirit Jule defeated. A "come with me " Jen ends with a " It was amazing!" Jule . There is a spread of values \u200b\u200bof the revolution, so that it goes even further trying to break the rules of good organization and planning. Despite the feelings that end up in infatuation also play a role in this identification process.

The film then gives a twist that leads to the kidnapping of Hardenberg by three friends, the subsequent escape and refuge in a lonely place that enables dialogues without waste. There, the director offers us the opportunity to see another point of view. Hardenberg ago to talk about your history and your personal evolution. In a way, it is reflected in the idealism of these young people. In 68 he was like them and now look at yourself first to be justified and then to be ashamed. On the other hand, Peter, Jean and Jule Harenberg see what ever they would like to become over time, the obligations of adult life or the weight of decisions. The phrase " be left after 30 is not having brains and not be before 30 is not having a heart " given for many interpretations and discussions. But ultimately all seek to be justified from the situation at present, and the other is not for them but their own fear, threat or the other side of his life.

At this point the vocational aspect that is reflected is the "first love" which over time will domesticating and cooling. The momentum and the first vocational dreams will leave to one side as a "mature." Put another way, you can also see the tense relationship that we all live from our ego ideal "(which sucks) and the" real me "(which really do). It is our mediocrity and contradiction, with which one has to reconcile and find a balance that makes you grow. A contradiction that our heroes find the end to the kidnapping of Mr. Harenberg did " to save his skin, not to save the world ."

I can not resist mentioning another perspective for reflection, even knowing that is very particular. In dialogues between young people and their dreams and pragmatism Harenberg discover an almost perfect parallel to what happens in our religious communities where the greatest forgot they were young, and young people only value what is new apart from the traditional. A reading of the film in this sense can be equally interesting.

The Edukators still offers many possibilities and touches many other topics: social and personal revolution, the struggle for justice, being and having regard to happiness, lifestyle, use of money, consumerism ... even friendliness which code is broken when one falls for the girlfriend of a friend (an issue I have not touched). If the moderator has time, you can watch the movie whenever you want to delve into these issues here there are only implied.

a paragraph of JJM out of http://www.bloggermania.com/content/view/4308/2/

"It certainly has interesting things this second film by Austrian Hans Weingartner (Das Weisse Rauschen). For example, his critical eye to the generation of May '68, now fully gentrified and sedentary, and his idealistic exaltation of peaceful actions to improve society. "I think we live in a time when young people yearn for political change but do not know where to start," noted Hans Weingartner. It is possible that the company has reached a point of individualism that leaves no room for collective dynamism. " This is solved either minimally Hans Weingartner, with a hyper efficient staging, sound and stage director a clever humorous counterpoints resources. However, too often strains the demagogic verbiage some of the dialogues, as well as superficial moral permissiveness respect to sex and drugs. At this point we note that the film has feet of clay, as his social and anthropological-counter compared to the allegedly spoiled and unsupportive society, "is too ethereal, anarchist and ultimately superficial"

JJM

vocational Topics The Edukators : ideal self-real self, ideals, happiness, be-have, commitment, crisis, life choice, commitment, justice.

The official movie website is an interview with the director who can get ideas for discussion. Search http://www.golem.es/losedukadores/index.php?s=director

4.material to work the film.

4.1.Ver and analyzed.

- What are the ideals of Jen and Peter?

- To what extent they are consistent with those ideals?

- What is the status of Jule? How does she know the real business the night of his friends?

- What phrase Hardenberg its dialogue with you most attention?

-Al final listen to the song Hallelujah by Jeff Buckley Leonard Coen version of which proved very popular. I reproduce the letter and a translation to answer: what do you tell the director to get this song at the end of the movie? What do you suggest? What are the images of this particular "video-clip?

Now I've Heard There Was a secret chord That David played
, and it pleased the Lord
But you do not really care for music, do you? It goes like this

The fourth, the fifth
The minor fall, the major lift
The baffled king composing Hallelujah

Your faith was strong but you needed proof
You saw her bathing on the roof
Her beauty and the moonlight overthrew you
She tied you
To a kitchen chair
She broke your throne, and she cut your hair
And from your lips she drew the Hallelujah

You say I took the name in vain
I don’t even know the name
But if I did, well really, what’s it to you?
There’s a blaze of light
In every word
It doesn’t matter which you heard
The holy or the broken Hallelujah

I did my best, it wasn't much
I Could not feel, so I tried to touch
've Told the truth, I did not come to fool you

And Even Though It all
I Went Wrong ' ll Stand Before The Lord of Song With nothing
on my tongue But Hallelujah

heard there was a secret chord That David played
to please God
But you're not interested in music or maybe yes ?
The thing is thus
the fourth, fifth, the minor fall and major lift the baffled king composes
hallelujah

Your faith was strong but you needed Dress
try bathing her in heaven,
Her beauty and the moonlight overthrew you

tied you to a kitchen chair She broke your throne
and
cut your hair And from your lips she drew the Hallelujah

know I took the name in vain
And do not even know the name
But if you know what that mean for you? A glow


In every word It does not matter that you've heard or defeated Holy hallelujah

I did the best I could, it was not too
I did not feel so I tried to play
I told the truth, no I came to deceive
And even thinking
That was all a mistake I will be following the Lord
that
Song And my lips will only Hallelujah

4.2.Nos challenges.

"Imagine you receive a" visit "the Edukators and you leave the note" Your days of plenty are numbered, "how would you react?

- What are your ideals? What is your dream?

- To what extent are consistent with your ideals?

- What do you know movement "Another world is possible"? (Let's avoid the term "anti-globalization" for its ambiguity? Have you been part of some organized activities (demonstrations, forums, Internet ...)? Tells your experience.

-Jen tells him to Jule a way of dealing with injustice: first recognize and then act. Is it enough? What conclusion do you get when compared with the traditional scheme of Christian base communities See-Judge-Act?

- What are similarities and differences between this movement and the proposal of the United that makes Jesus of Nazareth?

- What inspires you the message Jesus daily?

4.3. pray

* Canto appropriate and known by the group

* Prayer: Lord ...

Lord, I want to be the wind that sweeps the streets.

storm I want to be dragging the man along. I wish I

fire burning, burning and shining. Call

that tears the night and fog.

I would be the same as the waters murmuring,

like the Great River, free of ties ...

Lord I wanted to be a source that does not stop flowing,

a creek that runs beside the road, eco

crying in the forest.

I want to be forest in which men are lost,

and they rest on the lawn,

cool shade,

and ripe fruit that falls from the tree at the foot of the hungry.

Lord, I want to be dark storm in the sky,

black cloud creeps over the city.

Ray wanted to be, that falls from the sky,

and like rolling thunder in the deep valleys

and mighty mountains.

As night would be me

which arouses nostalgia strange men,

as wind blowing through the trees of autumn.

Lord, You know the storm and night and night and day, and noon

burning.

(C. Bliekast)

* Word of God: Rom 7, 15-25

* Personal reflection. Also time to share what we have thought about the film in light of the Word of God. Spontaneous prayer.

* scream If

find joy,

seek, seek.

If a friend moves away,

cry, cry.

If a home does not want me,

will leave, leave.

I can not find joy,

seek, seek

But if my people cry,

freedom if they take my brothers,

scream.

On the roads,

fight with my people.

scream on the road.

scream on the road,

my people die.

When you have no hope

pray, pray.

When I feel defeated,

follow, follow.

When fail in life,

silent, quiet.

When you have no hope,

pray, pray.

But if my people crying ...

( R. Cantalapiedra )

* Requests For many young people who look and do not find meaning in their lives

-Give your life Lord.

So many young people who doubt and are afraid to choose in life.

-Lord Give your life.

So many young

disillusioned and tired of living.

-Lord Give your life.

So many young people looking into drugs, alcohol, sex ... a means to escape reality.

-Lord Give your life.

So many young people who feel misunderstood and passed everything.

-Lord Give your life.

So many young people who struggle and are committed by others.

-Lord Give your life.

* Father