Brown Discharge Using Seasonique

Andres Allamand and the powers that I

When Chile opened its democracy, one of the figures who spoke was a young lawyer Andrew Allamand, founder of the National Renewal party. It was the promise of the right that had not participated in the Military and other Government or had been directly responsible for institutional breakdown, as I like to say some, because it was a minor. I do not like the term "institutional breakdown " hidden intentions as totalitarian left and let everyone accountable.

The biography of the current defense minister, Allamand has its roots in history right, not only in the last twenty years, but from the Unidad Popular. are presented as moderate and liberal political enthusiasts against the UDI .

Probably, when it begins March Allamand be invited to 'Zero Tolerance' and 'National Government'. Panelists will progres happy with the purge conducted by lifting former Army CNI and DINA. Unlike the Minister, do not expect to see every weekend 'Zero Tolerance'. Lost many neurons.

At the end of military government, the right lawyer had also participated in the National Accord, which made no sense, because the military had their itinerary.

Then in democracy, is recognized along with former Christian Democrat president, Edgardo Boeninger as the promoter of the 'democracy of the agreements' . However, the author of the democracy of the agreements is the Pinochet himself, before handing over power, he spoke of consensus. There is a I have pending book called Pinochet and the Restoration of National Consensus (Geniart, 1998), July Cannesa Balart Robert and Francisco Pérez.

Similarly, in the same period a promoter of political and economic reforms. In the political sphere is responsible for national security reforms, the end of the appointed senators, among others. In the economic field, he and the current President of the Republic were responsible for taxes raise them to the Chileans, and then later approve the labor reform, which stiffened the market since then. Allamand with Sebastián Piñera, Lily Pérez, and attorney Senator Alberto Espina and were known as the 'youth squad' in the early nineties. In retrospect, with the right group on the defensive again as in the first half of the twentieth century until the 70's. He returned to the opposition and appeasement as they were literally taking the flags on the left being the government. Hence, means praise from socialist to Allamand Eugenio Tironi.

which also was released to the public debate that the right idea was to dispense with the economic right. Allamand the contrary, the former MP and writer Hermogenes Perez de Arce, go to the business almost as enemies. Indeed, former columnist Mercury, when asked why they vote for the right business, he replies, they vote for those who respect private property. For Perez de Arce seems quite natural, but not the current Minister of Defense.

denounced the powers that be. Who were the powers that be? Employers Sofofa embodied in the military and El Mercurio. In fact, at that time speak ill of a Pinochet minister who ran for the Presidency, namely José Piñera. Allamand said: " RN has 18% of the vote, but Hernán Briones, the lord of Sofofa, which supports José Piñera, worth to nominate the presidential candidate of the party sector full. " Joseph won 6.18% of votos.Veinte years later, the powers that are aligned to the left. I doubt that the brilliant lawyer has been repaired. Most columnists are left Mercury, entrepreneurs invited several ministers of the coalition to participate on the boards of large conglomerates and the Army treated as pariahs in their own comrades who fought terrorism. A Allamand before he will talk about brainwashing, he had been brainwashed. That quote has features Gramsci and Marxist. The superstructure dominates the structure. Perhaps, had the aim of becoming Gramsci on the right. According to a journalist in 2006, thanks to Allamand have " a modern business, that nothing wants to know about Pinochet and prefers to negotiate-and co-opt, with the Coalition, a highly professionalized armed forces and reasonably depoliticized and a more diverse media stage, where The Third models as well as Mercury public right. " What it omits is that the armed forces were professional before I got the Coalition. In addition, talk that the left did its job. Entrepreneurs got rich and got their business with the military, and the Christian Democratic coalition socialist the larger business sit well with them: "Employers love Lagos." If even the bank president, Hernan Somerville, who was the Chilean foreign debt negotiated in times of Pinochet, was happy with Bachelet.

However, Allamand never denounced the human rights groups, which are simply facades of terrorist groups. table saw as Communists before the lawyers get the son of a soldier as a prisoner and purging the army of former CNI and DINA . Nor has never questioned the continuing abduction and other aberrations legal counsel that he could be made. If pronounced, then you drop as moderate. Worried about equal civil unions, but not interested in equality law to former soldiers who fought terrorism. What the law says, from the Amnesty Law, prescription benefits or prison, is not pronounced, because the current defense minister is a coward. Hopefully

have its second journey through the desert for the sake of right.

Root Tapper Beer Game

Debate Interview magazine about the book "Equal Marriage"

"At issue was equality"

By Natalia Monterubbianesi Author equal marriage. Intrigues, tensions and secrets in the way the law , Bruno Bimbi account the scenes since the project was conceived "Within ten years, the boys are to raise my hand in school to ask the teacher: 'Miss, is it true that in his time could not marry gays? ".

Bruno Bimbi, journalist and Argentina activist of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (FALGBT), imagine this dialogue futuristic compared to today could be on the law of divorce or the female vote. The adoption of equal marriage law, the July 14, 2010, made Argentina the tenth country to allow civil marriages between same sex. Equal rights with the same names.
But this punishment had a long history, documented in Bimbi
Equal Marriage. Intrigues, tensions and secrets on the road to the law , published by Planeta. Among the peculiarities of the debate that split the blocks as few Salta deputy Alfredo Olmedo-one of the tail closed " and yellow jacket, was catapulted to fame, Cynthia Hotton orange organized a crusade evangelist, children with signs of "Dear Mom and Dad" Elisa Carrio "pulled the closet" to a lesbian congresswoman your block without your permission, and Mauricio Macri went back and forth between support the law and its decision not to allow a marriage despite a court ruling. But the discussion also made speeches to the story, as the deputy Ricardo Cuccovillo, speaking as a parent of a gay son. And, in a talk with Debate , Bimbi highlights another memory "the only law was voted as a member Nestor Kirchner" .
What began to develop the idea of \u200b\u200bgoing for equal marriage?

A number of militant groups raised form a federation, which then grew and became what is now the FALGBT. These initial four or five groups agreed to a set of national priorities. Among them, the argument over marriage.

What year?

was more or less, in 2005, and was greatly influenced by the adoption of gay marriage in Spain. Until then, it was only legal in some countries very distant and different from ours, as the Netherlands. However, when it passed in Spain, we were talking about a country that, historically and culturally, has many ties with Argentina. Spain gave us another boost to think that if there might be, here as well. The FALGBT learned a lot from Pedro Zerolo and Beatriz Gimeno, English LGBT Federation.

Early in the debate, tried to settle the civil union alternative.
This created confusion, especially because the Comunidad Homosexual Argentina agreed. Why alleged that he was a segregationist project?
From the Federation always maintained that what was at issue was not the inheritance or pension, it was the joint adoption rights or concrete materials, beyond which were very important. What was at issue was something much deeper: equality. And, if you created a different institution with a different name, and there would be a loophole that survived from 1888, but the Argentine Congress in 2010, was to legislate saying that there were two categories of people: homosexuals and heterosexuals. It's like society to separate blacks and whites, Christians and Jews or Argentine-born and immigrants, and that "the Jews are entitled to this and Christians on this. " The idea of \u200b\u200bcivil unions as an alternative to marriage for gay couples is based on a doctrine that had great importance in the U.S., the "separate but equal." During the discussion of racial segregation laws in the groups, whites had to sit back later and blacks. A failure of justice upheld the law saying that while the seats were as comfortable there was no problem because it was guaranteeing equality. That is, equal but separate. This justified racism. Many of the arguments against gay marriage were modeled on those used in the U.S. against interracial marriage. That is the ideological and philosophical basis to propose two institutions with different names.

At first, the Government assessed that it was the political momentum to move forward with the law, but gives the feeling that, when released were really in depth. In the distance, "assesses that was a wise decision or should expect those conditions have opened the debate anyway?

three years ago would have said "I want to discuss it now." Today, the law already passed, I think it is counterfactual, I do not know what had happened. The political process was the way it was, had to be pushing. There were people in the government that from day one agreed with this and with us as Aníbal Fernández and María José Lubertino, who played an important role, and others who had to convince. Other politicians were against it until the end, as Gabriela Michetti or Liliana Negre de Alonso, because they believe in discrimination. And some were not sure or never have thought.

Some judges did rise to the protections of couples who wanted to marry, does that influenced the decision of Congress?

Absolutely. When we launched the campaign, first study how the discussion had been given in other countries. In some, it was legalized through Congress at the initiative of government, in others, the decision reached by way of justice. So we decided to go all the way at the same time: we went to the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate, to justice, with habeas corpus throughout the country with the intention of reaching the Supreme Court and, on the other hand, try to convince the Government. Lawmakers Vilma Ibarra, Silvia Augsburger and Eduardo Di Pollina were played and accompanied us with their projects when talking about gay marriage seemed crazy. We also talked with all opposition parties. At the time of the vote, and had spoken publicly in favor concerning as Néstor Kirchner, Ricardo Alfonsin, Mauricio Macri, Hermes Binner, Margarita Pino Solanas Stolbizer and beyond that after had some pretty deplorable attitudes
(NDR, went on to say that gay marriage "no one cares") .
then had couples who have married through the courts, as Alex Freyre and Joseph Di Bello, in Tierra del Fuego.

Yes, some had already been married by court decisions. There was a case
(NDR: Mary Rachel and Claudia Castro) reached the Supreme Court. The Court had the decision, but as it was debated in the Senate decided to wait. If you do not approve of the law, leaving the decision to endorse the marriage.
How were these audiences that Negre de Alonso called "festivals of democracy"?

When the bill passed the Senate, Negre de Alonso
(NDR: President of the General Law Committee , head of project) sought some form of treatment delay and win by attrition. Organized meetings in all provinces, which pompously called public hearings but were not, with the Catholic Church and evangelical churches. Most were meetings fan. It was as if in Buenos Aires did a meeting with the party of Alejandro Biondini and a group of ladies of Tradition, Family and Property and say that it is representative. She described them as "festivals of democracy" but said things were really atrocious, and that homosexuality was a disease, who were neurotic, perverse, sinful, we would go to hell, you had to exterminate.
The project divided the parties but there were two moments that seem to be aligned with good part of the Senate Committee: Jorge Bergoglio letter that spoke of "holy war" and the strong response of Nestor and Cristina Kirchner. Did you?

Absolutely. At one point, senators block of the Front for Victory was quite divided. Nestor and Cristina had taken the decision to go in depth with this topic. We recognize. Kirchner was even a tribute to the pride march last, a week after his death, with one minute followed by applause from more than one hundred thousand people. But beyond the support of the Government, many officers were pressured senators in their provinces by bishops, there was a strong campaign under the table. But Bergoglio made a grave political mistake: when his campaign was going well and was getting by threatening to turn a lot of votes, went above the table to say publicly that it was a war of God against the Devil and the Devil was Kirchner . In war, soldiers must be aligned with their commander in chief. There were many Senators of the Front for Victory who said "if a war against the Government, I will vote for what they say my President."

On the other hand, did legislators who saw the law as an official victory, and therefore voted against it?

Yes position much of the Radical Civic Union was shameful. Some key leaders of radicalism, as Ernesto Sanz, Gerardo Morales and Ricardo Alfonsin, had publicly supported the law and worked to get out, but they revolted much of the block. For senators and Luis Petcoff Naidenoff or Ramon Mestre for example, who had shameful attitudes, winning a political tug of war, circumstantial and situational Kirchner was more important than human rights of thousands of people.

What changed the law of equal marriage?

tangible and important thing is that there are thousands of people who are happier today. It was not as serious as it looked. They said that they would end the species that the Apocalypse was coming. But the sun still rises every day. The difference is those thousands of people who are happier today.

And in concrete terms?

All week I get an invitation to a wedding. This shows how the concrete daily life of thousands of people who are married and the parents, children, siblings. There are kids who do not had social work, and thanks to this law, now have or are unable to access social benefits, or an inheritance. But above all, there is a moral recognition. People who were illegal now legal, it stopped being an outcast to the law. The deeper we took a step towards being a more inclusive and less biased.



FB.init (fd962a4261c1dae2247ca386e8de2db6 ");

Brent Everett Brent Corrigan And Three

French Resistance and the Chilean left

left the world of work only in fantasy. The world saw the results of leftist politics in the last century, which cost humanity nothing less than the extermination of 100 million human beings. So when the Communist Party and its allies are saying: "Another world is possible", one must be wary. They promised the sky, however, brought hell. Let stand while this article, I remembered that another possible world that is left is the life of hunters and gatherers as shown by these survival programs.

Well, for the Chilean left, whether socialist, liberal, socialist and communist, always liked to compare the military government to the Vichy government during World War II. However, the left during the Cold War and went to the UP side of Soviet totalitarianism, not the side of bourgeois democracy. The democracy he left declared war on the rest of society, I consider various theoretical basis of Marxism, which were the conditions for a socialist society. Only had to sharpen the conflict to get to paradise. For that reason, used shock troops in the streets as the Brigada Ramona Parra and others, which do not have anything to envy the Bolsheviks who used first, then Mussuline fascists and Hitler's Nazis. call today flaite .

Thus we see that the terrorist Manuel Rodriguez Patriotic Front (FPMR) and responsible for the attack on Pinochet killing five of his bodyguards in the Cajon del Maipo, César Bunster said in an interview with French socialist newspaper L'Humanité ":" there are circumstances that require, as the French Resistance, risking death for life. The Communists have made great pages of the twentieth century. It is urgent to restore and revive the memory . " Naturally, the death of the guards does not constitute a violation of rights, nor the troops of human rights lawyers will sue against Bunster. These guys love to talk about memory. Hence the Museum of Memory. In view of the attack, then the security agency execution was simply terrorists who were targeted. Of course, this is a violation of human rights. And are the 'victims of the dictatorship. " Eye for an eye. The terrorist group belonged Bunster which resembles the Nazis because they did not want a return to democracy, but a communist dictatorship.

Note also that no regret for their crimes. Instead, right-wing politicians have to do all the time 'mea culpa', as did the Deputy Alberto Cardemil . Another victory for the left. "The deputy Hales mea culpa will be required to terrorist groups such as Mir and the Front?

also struts saying that the attack was inspired by who made the ETA under Franco against White Race.

The same story of the resistance we see in the back of the book of terrosita and millionaire Max Marambio, a friend of Fidel, "The Arms of yesterday, other times I said:" From the dark days after 11 September 1973, a young leftist activist, begins, like the neo-realist character of the first Italo Calvino in the fight against fascism in his country, strong in the solitude of the Cuban embassy in Santiago, surrounded by military forces . " Following

witch hunts, the demonizing and trash about former CNI and DINA, academia, not far behind. Thus, the columnist of 'The Third' and university professor of the chair Bolaño, Cecilia García Huidobro equates trained security agency to combat terrorism compared to the Nazis, commenting on the book of the French Jewish Journal, Hélène Berr "We believe more freely shake after the tedious obligation to be consistent, but that has instead helped to become complicit (by negligence rather than by conviction) of abuses like those suffered by the family Berr and others such as those in Chile by the CNI. Recently there have been appointments to the Army soldiers who admitted belonged to the CNI, which has not even merited a national debate. " These leftists live in fantasies. Perhaps inspired Bolaño himself. The national taboo that has been imposed, whether in universities, media and politics is the option for violence by the left, from 1967 to 1973. Maybe take out a law about it.

As former blogger said Francisco Ibero, the Chilean left was stuck in the 40's of last century.

How Do I Get On To Fakku

The same distortion of 20 years ago

Those who are in the government of Sebastián Piñera, not like that opponents of right to call them either 'V Concertación 'or' IV of the Christian Democrats. " How can a government of law is confused with the Christian Democrats, which here is characterized by ongoing ambiguity and opportunism, that is, go where the sun is shining? The answer is very simple. The answer is a question: How Piñera has a photo of former President Eduardo Frei in his desk at La Moneda, the latter being despised right?

However, the current government continues on the path being drawn by the Partnership with respect to the soldiers who fought terrorism, namely, wants to become an outcast of society, whether of Mir in the early years and then Manuel Rodriguez Patriotic Front (FPMR), which was the armed wing of the Communist Party. And yet, the current President has the arrogance to speak of 'national unity' rather than 'reconciliation'.

Indeed, new defense minister who recently was a senator, Andrew Allamand for the resignation of three consultants from the current undersecretary of the Army and former commander in chief of that institution, Izurieta, because the two passed by the National Intelligence (CNI) at the time of the military government. Parenthetically, those who criticize the government step Tohá as Bachelet government spokeswoman also have to bother the President has called on senators and Allamand Matthei to work in government. Senators were elected for, not government ministers. Both cheated the voters. A minimum of coherence.

left to Lenin and Stalin, the soldiers assigned to both the DINA and the CNI, are marked. Thus we see from the various interventions, for example, counsel for Human Rights and communist, of course, Congressman Hugo Gutierrez said: " No person who has integrated the DINA and the CNI security agencies of the military dictatorship has the integrity necessary to hold public office (...) should be removed from office . " In contrast, the terrorist and their assistance if they can hold public office, as Senator, former MIR and Economy Minister Carlos Ominami; Bachalet itself helps Mir who was in the Popular Unity Front in time after the Government military, former Defense Minister and former founder of Mir, José Goñi, who wanted to infiltrate into the Navy and the Secretary of Aviation, Raúl Vergara, who was accused of treason by their peers to drop the UP, because it was linked to Mir . A Allamand never in the past twenty years he has heard call for his resignation to those people and others that I forget. Moreover, the current Minister of Defense with Cristina Bitar and Felipe Lamarca went to the presentation the book 'The Arms of yesterday' terrorist Mir and millionaire, Max Marambio. Book that was mentioned by the media, in which a young terrorist is hiding in the embassy of Cuba to fight fascism is coming. So says the cover of the book. Cristina, I have read, I was amazed at the maturity of the players who went to that event, after many years of confrontation.

one hand, the Socialist Party said: "We are a new political generation that we are not by hatred or revenge, but we demand the truth and justice in the massive and systematic violations of the dignity of Chileans and Chilean . "That statement believe it or not the devil. Moreover, Party for Democracy (PPD) said: "This body an unlawful society created and dedicated to consummate the most brutal, systematic violations of Human Rights, which represents one of the darkest stages of the history of our country, to have belonged to it is a serious and our political position is that they should henceforth cease to be part of the armed forces who have all been part of that conspiracy . "

wanted to be put over the last twenty years of "'National Reconciliation'? That any military personnel assigned to the DINA and the CNI is synonymous, equivalent (==), or equal (=) to violate human rights. The words of Minister of Interior, Rodrigo Hinzpeter confirmed: " our position on CNI is super clear: any person who has participated in a violation of the rights hum years." Discards, pardoned terrorists Governments of the Coalition and went to prison privileges supported by the PS and PPD did not violate human rights.

The new defense minister's resignation asked Brigadier General ®, Orlando Carter and Alejandro Romero Cuadra Peragallo, Jose Perez Manriquez. The last two were assigned to the CNI.
Al has reached such a pitch of madness, that Mr. Carter Orlando Cuadra asked to resign for being son of General 'political prisoner', Manuel Contreras. In a letter published in 'The Third' and 'The Desk', the official Orlando Carter contends that his resignation was due to 'political pressure' " But now, the government of" National Unity " I can not work on my original profession for me, at least, to the President of the Republic and the Minister of Defence is politically incorrect . "Piñera president put somebody who does twenty years, denounced the powers that be. And now we see that the defense minister to block the real power of the Association of Relatives of Disappeared Detainees and lawyers

DD.HH. communist stand between the permanence permanence of General Castro, Chief of Staff Army. However, Allamand to justify the charge of general said: " By the mere fact of having an officer on active duty, was intended at some point in his career, particularly at the beginning of it, the CNI, the fact alone is not a factor that will disqualify him to go ahead with his military career . The former parliamentary never heard him defend the presumption in the military who were assigned to the CNI and DINA, and as a parliamentarian said the UDI were simple distributions, which were at one time. That is, if they stayed longer, that the disabled. Repeat Left discourse.

One way to characterize people whether they are right or left, is whether conform to reality, and therefore to the truth, or they drift through their fantasy, inventing a past. By the way, the truth is not well appreciated in those days. Indeed, Professor of School of Government at Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Gonzalo Bustamante and his column "The CNI and disabling General Castro "is an example. The university professor is Allamand fans, Hinzpeter and Company. One hopes that scholars stick to the facts, to reality. Well, it seems that Mr. Bustamante does not like. Compare the security agency of the military government, which faced terrorism with the Cosa Nostra and the Juarez Cartel. He writes: " the DINA, the CNI, like the Gestapo, the Stasi or Securitate, lack of legitimacy by seeking the same ends, which are at variance with the minimum for the state as such: to safeguard the integrity of individuals and their property. " Then compare the military government that fought Soviet totalitarianism puts them in the same level of communist and Nazi regimes. The military junta civil society was born because I asked, not wanting to fall under a communist dictatorship. It then compares the security agencies with the Ku Klux Klan, the Red Brigades, Al-Qaeda and the Ustasha. Then recommends a denazification as occurred in Germany and France in the Post-War between those who participated or not the government, or " their law enforcement agencies and those who do ." The last date will not have to envy the Chilean nation, he wrote: " linked to law enforcement agencies of the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet ." In other words, the last Gonzalo Bustamante's column could have written any left-wing intellectual, whether the historian Gabriel Salazar MIR either sociologists Manuel Antonio Garreton, Thomas Moulian and Eugenio Tironi, or any columnist for 'The Clinic'. Bustamante is a leftist. I miss you no more in his column said that security agencies have committed crimes against humanity and state terrorism to be on par with the PPD, PS and PC also repeated the classification of 'conspiracy' by "simply a criminal nature organization. At the rate we will compare the British SAS and U.S. Seals fighting Al-Qaeda with that group terrorist. How strange that no mention of the Mir, FPMR, the Montoneros, FARC and Sendero Luminoso Tupamaros?

But why do the same distortion of the past 20 years? Because the read the statements of PS, PPD and Gonzalo Bustamante column reminds me of the experience I had, that has nothing to envy 1984, when Burton forced him to see five fingers instead of four to John Hurt or the English version of Evil Residet . a claustrophobic experience and drowning. Each time a Leftist demonizing the DINA and the CNI, with the pretext of defending the UP and terrorist groups, would not let me speak, or say that these body faced such and such terrorist groups. And all you had left was rhetorical. After that, I get the stuttering singer Roger Daltrey 'The Who' with the song "My Generation" . Only for good weather, which was a personal experience became a national pandemic. We see it in the letter published in 'The Third', which criticizes the lawyer Axel Buchheister , to denounce a witch hunt by the way the son of General Contreras: " The writer is unaware that the fact of having been part of an agency extermination. " PC zombies through FPMR with her placement of weapons in Carrizal Bajo wanted to exterminate us like the PS and the Mir in the Unidad Popular. Moreover, the lawyer Buchheister just realize the witch hunt on the left.

The Tiffany And Co Christmas Advertisement

Callalily Human Rights witch hunters hunted

On Thursday January 28th terrorist was captured in the town of Mir Limache, Hector Tapia Collantes, who was a fugitive since 2000. Indeed, the terrorist was sentenced to 15 years in Brazil for kidnapping businessman Abilio Diniz São Paulo in 1989 along with fellow Mir, Maria Emilia Marchi, Sergio Olivares, Ulises Gallardo and Pedro Fernandez. Naturally, because of an agreement between the government of Chile and Brazil, Collante asking you to pay his conviction in Chile. According to press reports: " In 1999 he was given the benefit of serving his sentence in Chile and just spent a year in detention, where he was awarded the prison at night. After that he had escaped and was caught just yesterday in the same town where his family resided . "

Mir The other terrorist who sought the same were Maria Emilia Marchi, Sergio Olivares Urtubia, Ulises Gallardo and Pedro Fernández Lembach. Were granted. Finally, the terrorists were granted daily departures, which have been denied the military locked in 'gulags' Punta Peuco and Cordillera.

Meanwhile, Ulises Gallardo remains attached to Mir, making speeches in which they are proud to have founded the terrorist group. If we were in Poland, could not speak in public.

Maria Emilia Marchi was sentenced to 28 years in prison for the kidnapping of the businessman. He spent a year in prison, because after he was granted parole. also was involved in the case MOP-Gate. After your release terrorist engineer, was tax concessions in Viña del Mar, until 2002.

's diary supposedly right, 'El Mercurio' from January 19, 2000, he says, for example, MIR Olivares " was detained for political reasons between 1974 and 1978 " (the bold mine), before it rolled out its Lagos Valech Report on Political Imprisonment and Torture. Then they went to Mr. Fernandez could not think of anything better than to continue killing. So " participated in the guerrilla Nicaragua and El Salvador."

Back then, the Ministerial Secretary of Justice (SEREMI) of the Metropolitan Region, Maria Eugenia Jana, granted benefits.

Also, according to press for the PDI (Police Investigations) was one of the most wanted criminals. This last, I could not check in time at the site of the PDI, which shows the most wanted. However, not captured the Human Rights Brigade, but the FBI's Limache, as the former is solely dedicated to apprehending former retired military officers - or old-who had an excellent performance in its military institutions. We must remember the scandal that armed coverage and the governments of the Concertación and the media, when he escaped retired General Raul Iturriaga Neumann because they do not implement the law that certainly benefit them.

Note also that the Government of the time, that is, the terrorist Héctor Ricardo Lagos Collante gave him the benefit of the prison at night. This benefit and other exit and Sunday have been denied the military who have served their sentence and others that continue to play.

Human Rights Counsel, the communist MP was elected with the votes of useless fools Chile, the Christian Democrats, Hugo Gutierrez said he is opposed to the benefits to the military prison in reply to right-wing deputy, Alberto Cardemil, who is in favor of the benefits: " benefit Bregar prison for these violators of human rights is, in one way or another, be encouraging impunity for crimes committed by the dictatorship and, of course, that I'll never favor. "

here is to apply the law, not an academic dispute as they sometimes do not like politicians. The military have the law in their favor.

Human Rights Callalily see it otherwise. Indeed, the judge investigating the assassination of Senator Jaime Guzmán, Mario Carroza determined that " is a crime against humanity the imprescriptible." This trial did not satisfy recognized human rights lawyer, Hector Salazar He said: " a crime is political in nature (...) I have my doubts if it corresponds to against humanity." For its part, the president of the Association of the Disappeared (AFDD) said: " crimes against humanity are committed by the soldiers protected by the state to exterminate a group of people and it happened during the dictatorship " . Since the AFDD always supported the terrorism of the Mir and the FPMR, did not like the opinion of the judge.

know that the judge is wrong, because the law against such crimes governs the present to future, not the present to past, that is, under the rule of law is not you can apply a new law after the crime.

It communist organization had argued that the crime of UDI senator, was a common crime. And, therefore, not a crime that violates human rights.

Human Rights Counsel, Pamela Pereira, who negotiated with Ricardo Lagos to pardon the terrorists, whom she called 'political prisoners', we see now, that question the presence of General Staff, Guillermo Castro, for his institution assigned it to the CNI: "They know they are people who can not be in the armed forces".

O fools, and Jose Clara Szczaranski Zallaquett who proposed as a violation of Human Rights, obedience, because the ex-communist and supporter of the UP, sympathized with the terrorists. Zallaquett

himself, former head of the International Executive Committee of Amnesty International, had earlier said in a radio arbitrarily, that terrorists do not violate human rights. Instead, the military itself. It's that simple.

Meanwhile, the people they govern, believes that catering to the left, will rise in the polls .