When first I heard of Wikileaks thought it was like Wikipedia. But it was referred to the transparency of governments. Are so few. It later emerged that he had infiltrated the U.S. government revealed details of the Iraq War, among other things. Revealing that if there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and how many conservative columnists had denounced American liberals, is that the weapons went to Syria. Why not find them. This proved that the press would not give the reason for former President George W. Bush., Much less the liberals.
This problem with the government U.S. has allowed us to show the hypocrisy of many actors. The hypocrisy is the very first owner of Wikileaks, Julian Assange, who hours earlier announced prohibited from disclosing information to the media that "Wikileaks complaint attack on their website to disclose hours " . It shows the character of this man. If you write "complaint Wilileaks attack" in Google search results 890,000 appear in 0.39 seconds. However, if one writes "Wikileaks announces attack" 1,020,000 results appear in 0.27 seconds. Yesterday, Tuesday announced a new Wilileaks means " Wikileaks further attacks on their systems computer ". Poor. Who would want to harm a human being so selfless? He, a young idealistic leftist guerrillas and terrorists in Latin America. Mr. Julian Assange in practice attacked the U.S. diplomatic cables to reveal, among other things. Fortunately, it occurred to disable hackers Assange and its basic services of the nation, as shown 's latest film "Die Hard 4.0" . Therefore he can not complain that the U.S. government attempt to access your site by the poor. Thanks are also Julian is in our era and World War II, probably because the Nazis would be announced the day of the Normandy landings.
Then there is the hypocrisy of the media, who act according to their ideological interests. The writer Eduardo Labarca , who was in charge of falsifying the memoirs of General Prats Communist Party orders, makes an analogy to the impact between the The Pinochet File published by the American Peter Kornbluh on Nixon's intervention against Allende . It must be said again, as Monica Gonzalez Labarca never admit that overthrew citizenship Allende and not the CIA. Labarca speaks of "impact" for both files such as Wilileaks Kornbluh. But that is relative. In counterpoint, when they were published in 1999 Mitrokhin Archive, by Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin little or nothing was said. The first was a spy who fled to the UK and the second is a historian. That file actually proved that the KGB had its tentacles in various parts. However, if you type "Mitrokhin archive" in the form of Emol will find two articles: one own newspaper and the other is a column of former MP and writer Hermogenes Perez de Arce dated October 5 of 2005, alleging that Allende was a KGB agent. What happened in the country? Nothing. The first citizen of the Republic was a spy, working for a superpower, which was not precisely a liberal democracy. So much impact. Neither the media branded as 'right' to the left, dug more features, and may interview the Mayor himself Mitrokhin. In contrast, if the CIA, to the parliamentarians discussed.
diplomatic hypocrisy will continue on the reverse of what they think will be a before and after the revelations, and that is as old as prostitution.
0 comments:
Post a Comment