is customary in the intellectual world of the left constructed judges and even the witch hunters. All this suits him well, until they are stigmatized and damming. Following such reasoning, the Chilean writer Eduardo Labarca think of anything better than wetting the Argentine writer's grave in Switzerland, Jorge Luis Borges, because " Being elderly, nearly blind, came to Chile to greet the dictator ( Augusto) Pinochet in the days when he was killing . " By the way, promoting his book 'The Mystery of the modules'. When he came Borges, the terrorism of Mir went downhill. It's true. Terrorist is killed, which then went on to become the 'victims', as the father of former presidential candidate Mark Ominami Enríquez, Miguel Enriquez, founder of Mir, who presided over the Waves.
Chilean writer lacks any authority to try Borges. First it was communism, which becomes an accomplice of terror. Second, working in exile in Moscow Radio , becoming collaborators of human rights abuses that occurred in the countries of Eastern Europe and Soviet Russia. Third, in the magazine 'Today' from 1 to December 7, 1997, made a major tribute monsters and demons that Latin America has produced, and inspired young people to exalt violence to get power: Ernesto 'Che' Guevara. Hagiography on 'Che' is the title 'Che Guevara Superstar. "
Labarca by order of the Communist Party wrote the apocryphal book 'A Life in the legality' which was published by the Fondo de Cultura Economica long attributed to General Carlos Prats, who did not hide his sympathy for the totalitarian project of the Unidad Popular . He struts that because of that book " We got a goal from midfield to the CIA " . However, if the opponents say that the CIA had a goal to the Allende government, I doubt that you like him and those who supported the political project. The CIA I had a goal, but civil society.
Eduardo Labarca The event reminds me that my fellow left, while studying philosophy, he did not like his face taken out in support of totalitarian regimes. That made me witch hunter, which ruled the left while the Coalition had no problems in practice. Even that, to take 'the Pill' as they say in Chile, said the most crazy and insane that the Soviets were forced to obey the time of the Unidad Popular.
It is no surprise that he did Labarca. In fact, a famous and renowned Chilean novelist compared to Cortazar, so did something similar. I mean Roberto Bolaño. The only book I read was' The Savage Detectives. " The book is "By Night in Chile", which recreates in part the activity that made the literary critic of 'El Mercurio' during the military government, a philosophy professor and poet, the priest of Opus Dei, Jose Miguel Langlois. Bolaño recreation classes on Marxism Ignacio Valente him, it was his nickname Langlois, Pinochet, among other things. However, Bolaño feel not part of the literary establishment left, and courteous as other writers, I kept being a leftist. Popular Support Unit.
In the same vein, the Chilean writer and journalist Elizabeth Subercaseaux wrote a novel in which a right-wing politician, was allegedly involved in torture. The child is responsible to find out.
Finally, liberals are pure and even angels.
also reminds me of a discussion I had with Professor Victor Farias, when he came to the Institute of Humanistic Studies at the University of Valparaiso, to present his book on Heidegger and Nazism. Since he knew anything about the biography of Farias, I did my job to make him an uncomfortable question. Until then, the former student of Heidegger and Allende made no secret of his sympathies for communism, only it said in a subliminal way in the introduction to his book, namely that there was to condemn other forms of democracy, moreover, of liberal democracy. The other form of democracy that existed in the world, were called 'democracies', which were no more dictatorships. Your community flowed through the pores. I asked if all those who supported communism, including him, are as responsible as Heidegger and the Germans for the atrocities that were committed. I have to say that as I asked, the distinguished professor would not let me finish my question. He replied with the usual cliché explanation that Marx spoke of Gulag and Stalin was responsible, not Lenin. After Pablo Neruda sack when my question was about him and communism.
since I was in college, always bothered me that people left they had an excuse for everything from killing to pardon his fellow terrorists, which is denied to his opponents, whether the lieutenants and colonels who faced with terrorism, whether politicians who helped in the reconstruction. Ahead of the act of Labarca, I wrote a long poem titled 'Extenuating Circumstances'. In fact, for which read 'Crime and Punishment' by Dostoyevsky, remember that ultimately, justice is kind of Raskolnikov because he had a terrible life. That is the mitigating circumstance of Raskolnikov. Labarca know of Neruda's Ode to Stalin . However, seek a mitigating circumstance.
is a work in progress , as writers say.
I. MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES
rabid rage because
When a cleric
Marx to describe abuses of the communist dictatorship always justified
with extenuating circumstances.
Although a part of the world Have
exterminated twenty million people in Russia,
In another sixty million in China
And two million in Cambodia
Marx incredulous
always find a resource.
Plus, when the world learned the magnitude of Stalin
excesses and abuses, given known by Nikita
Kruscheuve.
stunned silent world. The
(novelists, poets, philosophers, painters, dramatists
, sociologists, journalists, political scientists
)
And Political
wrote a book smart to give it to
theorized; How
put Stalin in
of dialectic and historical materialism of Marx?
The Cardinals had said
"distorted the Stalin system. Well it was the system. "
system on the individual.
latter is not put into question, leading to
Because
concentration camps of Siberia.
had to be loyal to the dictatorship
and the new dictator, Nikita Khrushchev.
the justifications.
think was a danger to the Party,
Although attracted intellectuals in the world.
Good men were innocent party
Stalin alone was responsible.
Stalin was not an intellectual
As Lenin and Leon Trotsky.
Although public opinion had not,
Since the party was a prostitute;
Although one-party dictatorship had
Resolved multiplicity in unity: Although
were persecuted for thinking differently
Individuals. Never mind! After all
was a dissident of the proletariat
Although analogous to the Nazi,
always had a cause: Stalin,
In the words of the historian and philosopher,
Victor Farias. After all, not only for Farias,
But for other intellectuals (all related),
A dictatorship (Utopia)
Left is better than a right-wing dictatorship.
Stalin was rough. Lenin was an intellectual.
The intellectual does not kill. According to the cardinals
apostate dictatorship
did not know what Lenin did when he founded
the Soviet state.
is innocent. Made it clear in his will
refuted by it.
Lenin said
" This resource control and compulsory labor is stronger than the laws of the Convention and the guillotine. The guillotine was used only to intimidate, to overcome the active resistance. And we do not that's enough. Not enough, because not only need to 'intimidate' the capitalists, to make them feel the omnipotence of the proletarian state and does not dare to think about deploying an active resistance against him. We need to also overcome passive resistance, undoubtedly more dangerous and more harmful still. "
II.
When the Berlin Wall fell
When you got rid of the dictatorship.
That lasted for seventy years in Russia and forty other intellectuals and cardinals
not happy
(The joy is coming), said last
dissidents, such as Dante, the physicist
of Russia House even opponents
total power. Since
condemn cared more
The implementation of a planetary system
A
to celebrate the emerging democracies and freedom in Central Europe and Russia
So today is easy
View
Red Fascism nostalgic recalling old times , eg
The staging of "Alice Urderground" The Cardinal
Mauricio Celedon, who
beyond certain icons or some monsters
Everyone wanted to evoke the humanity well
Narrating their perverse utopian failures: from Marx to Allende
The philosopher Marx and his philosophy of resentment
psychopathic politician Lenin and Cheka and GULAG
His contempt for political freedoms
The autocrat "Che"
And his contempt for political freedoms and the ambiguous
Mr. Allende
Y three souls: one day liberal, revolutionary
Another day, another day
and agent CIA and KGB.
Being born in the distant future
As a grandson of Richard Nixon.
To Celedón
victims are forgotten communist dictatorships, hence
Lift statues of his killers,
As if they had been champions of human rights and freedom
Or as the poet John Cameron, odds old leftist who
sings
"you do not know Sporadic Islands
believe in utopias
reconstruction of the Berlin Wall"
3.
Those gentlemen who remained
Silent peers, while
An individual to think differently
was taken to the
Clinics and Psychiatrists Concentration Camps,
Soon to be tortured, drugged against his will and
Shot by saying: "Marx is wrong,
The system sucks."
What did? Or those who supported from afar
to dictatorship
as Volodya, Neruda, Galeano, Altamirano, Althusser, Gilles Deleuze
, Moulian, Saramago, Artaud, Rafael Alberti,
Robert Alt, Guayasamín, Fredia Kahlo, Paul Eluard, Picasso ,
Luis Sepulveda, Ariel Dorfmann, German Marin, Noam Chomsky, Peter
Lebemel, Benedetti, Zinn, Gabriel García Márquez, Sastre,
Rodrigo Atria, Eduardo Labarca, the montonero Juan Gelman
And etc, etc.
They have no individual responsibility, only
The
dictator, the dictator: Stalin.
and their emulators in the same color:
Mao Tse Tung, Ming Chin Ho, Castro, Caessescu, Pol-Pop,
not their successors or predecessors. So the hit man
of the political police of Czechoslovakia
Torture by the law of inertia in Newton.
He did not know what
not his superior.
Stalin had seized their bodies
and drivers from the here.
intellectuals and politicians are not ashamed of having been
Had CO
Supporting this dictatorship.
IS INEVITABLE THE DES
NA PE
OF RO
MO RAL?
"Here Radio Moscow to Chile - speaks Volodia and Eduardo Labarca -
important political freedom,
while outside the poet Joseph Brodsky
is sentenced to a psychiatric clinic outside Moscow,
To say:" The Inhuman
communist system, silly, Marx
You knucklehead, is an idiot "
Volodia from the silent radio along with other Chilean writers,
not in favor of it, because it is a reactionary enemy
Of his beloved Lenin and the system. Under other dictatorships
other
color are all responsible for being complicit. But the clerics
fist (symbol of totalitarianism)
still remained in the Chilean Socialist Party, as if nothing had happened.
not feel responsible, even though they were
Believers. No individual mea culpa. The mea culpa
applies, as the Cardinals,
For certain dictatorships. Because they are
The good, the rule does not apply.
Should we invite the restaurant
"The golden onion"
for artists and political supporters
the totalitarian utopia or real socialism or democracy
popular
bite each with onion. So
cry once in his life,
For the hundred million people were slaughtered in May
the Holocaust
For Utopia sinistra and social justice,
As described Grass with German Bourgeoisie
addicted to Nazism? Would
forced a gesture of repentance? Farias
would not have to repent (including him),
Since Karl Marx never spoke of
Concentration camps, police
policy, one-party lock Clinics
dissidents. Believers were,
denn all They Are Guilty.
Viña del Mar, 02/05/2001 to 04/07/2001
0 comments:
Post a Comment