Black Cocktail Dresses Under 50

Satisfying each group to have no opinion

Even when we are in late September, can not stop commenting on statements by the President Piñera, either on September 11, whether your words in the full Congress to celebrate the bicentennial, whether their words out of protocol on the day of the Army, who left did not like. And finally, to finish their statements of support for President of Colombia to deal with terrorism.

Few have noticed that President Sebastián Piñera contradicted his four statements. For someone who is guided by polls and focus groups not at all surprising. One day we support the anti-abortion, for example, and the next day, without saying any reflection, it supports the opposite group, just because it brings more profits. Let

the first unfortunate statement: " It seemed that the government and opposition at the time had intended to destroy each other and they did and, incidentally, destroyed our democracy ." I do not know if that statement is a product of post-modern relativism that reign in the nineties and is a variation of the ambiguity of the Chilean Christian Democracy. Naturally, that statement liked the people left from right, as progressives like a variation of the Chairman's statement, namely: "We are all guilty the collapse of democracy ." Sebastián Piñera put on the same level as those who defended democracy and freedom to those who used violence, terrorism, bullying and wanted to install a totalitarian regime. Now we know the President's reply to his brother José Piñera, when he compared Allende with Hitler. Where does the statement of the Comptroller, the Supreme Court and the Resolution of the Chamber of Deputies in August 1973? For Piñera, is the same as a person who uses violence to one that does not use it in politics, is the same as a group to expropriate land companies and one that defends, is the same as a group that despises derogatorily called bourgeois democracy a group that defends the resources available. Yet the progressive art world as the director Pablo Larraín and writer and screenwriter, Roberto Brodsky dare call it conservative. To my knowledge, no conservative here in the valley of the hot could in same plane to the supporters of communist totalitarianism and those who defended democracy. For someone who struts to admire former President Eduardo Frei, I have my doubts if he read the letter he sent to Mariano Rumor, " was absolutely determined to establish in the country a totalitarian dictatorship and were taking progressive steps to reach this situation, so that already in 1973 it was clear we were experiencing a regime quite unusual and that few steps remaining to give fully to establish a totalitarian dictatorship in Chile , or if you know the interview with English daily ABC: " The military were called, and fulfilled a legal obligation, because the legislature and the judiciary, Congress and the Supreme Court, had complained publicly that the President and his regime they broke the Constitution .... Allende came to establishing communism violent means. " If you read the agreement of the House, which accuses the government of Popular Unity " purpose of subjecting everyone to the strictest political and economic control by the state and thereby achieve the establishment of a totalitarian system ". Sometimes I have my doubts whether the current president, in fact, studied at Harvard, it would be unable to prepare a short essay three pages on a story by Edgar Allan Poe. I say this because many students of engineering or economics to do post-graduate courses in the university, are amazed that teachers put task to write essays on a given theme, each week as he is portrayed in the film of the nineties' Land of Shadows. " We saw for Tsunami not knowing the price of writing, to the fax of the Shoa.


After his speech to Congress Plenary reiterated statements he made on Saturday 11, the statement: " was certainly avoidable, but due to a sick democracy came much earlier. Excess sick ideologism, violence. That is why we need to know learn from our history. "This time the left did not like. If it was avoidable, why former President Eduardo Frei says, the Act of Rivera:" Nothing I can do , neither Congress nor any civilian. Unfortunately, this problem only with rifles arranged "?

addition, his statements more confusing to new generations.

The president's words is the result of the moral decay of the call 'youth squad' of the nineties made by the same Piñera, Lily Pérez, Alberto Espina and Andrew Allamand. The latter together with the former head of Pinochet IBS times, Felipe Lamarca said nothing of the nonsense written by the former terrorist, Max Marambio when they were invited to the launch of 'The Weapons of Yesterday. " Then we have the clones, Rubilar, who attended a tribute to Allende, Deputy lobotomy Monckeberg recommended us to visit the Museum of Memory, Francisco Chahuán, who are interested in future issues, but escapes in the past. In short, the same area of \u200b\u200bRN, which criticized the former ambassador Miguel Otero. I almost forgot, the current Interior Minister Hizpeter belonging to the same computer.

Then, for the Military Parade said the military is " to defend our homeland and to come to your aid whenever circumstances require or whenever that nature hit his forces." The military content. However, in the week had supported the Chilean society was sick. "This includes the Armed Forces who defended the country from the onslaught of totalitarian communist left?

And being in UN Piñera President supported the Colombian president, José Manuel Santos, after the death of guerrilla leader Jorge Briceno, alias "El Mono Jojoy, which stated:" but often the weakness against the terrorism and against the guerrillas produce more damage than combat vocation, with strength and commitment . " Previously said that the death of a guerrilla is good for humanity . " Sebastián Piñera with relativistic statement of September 11, strengthened to the left that shows off its terrorist past and showed weakness. In contrast, the current president turned his back to the military who fought terrorism in the Mir, the FPMR and the Front Lautaro, who are imprisoned unjustly by failing to respect its commitment before the election. The death of Chilean terrorist groups is a violation of human rights and crimes against humanity. The death of terrorist and founder of Mir, Miguel Enríquez is not a " good to mankind," but a "victim of the dictatorship " and all those who thought like him.

In August, the newspaper 'El Mercurio' advance the government's bicentennial this holiday season just past wanted " install the profile of" statesman "Pinera, moving away from political conflict and calling daily work together, inviting former presidents of the Coalition as a symbol of 'national unity'. And so, to settle the request for the pardon of the Church Chilean Catholic. Serious people in this country, we know that national unity and reconciliation to free passes to the military. If not, is pure political entertainment, which is something he likes to Piñera.

However, if the president is conservative Sebastián Piñera and statesman, then, I am Jesus or Buddha.

Ftse 250 Capitalisation List

Goodbye and thanks, Grandpa!

Forever your dignity, your memory and integrity in our hearts.

"We stick to what should be in place to what is "

SANCHÍS IMA - 11/09/2010

I have 53 years. I was born in Montpellier, living in Paris. Married, I have three daughters. I am a university professor and psychiatrist at the Hospital Sainte-Anne, who specializes in treating emotional disorders, anxiety and depression. I'm Christian and Buddhist center-

I saw a dead pigeon and I become sad ...

has received information from abroad that has caused a state of mind, a mental climate.

Metamorphosis silent.

moods are emotions very subtle, but define our emotional life much more than the excitement, that radical and simplify our perception of events. Emotions drive us to action, and states of mind, reflection.

Sometimes we do not know what to do with what we feel ...

I would rather say we do not know exactly how we feel and then fall into the brooding - turns him incessantly what happens to us, or flight, but every time we refuse to feel our states of mind, the problem persists. What you need to do is listen, have a message for us. The analysis of moods makes us smarter.

have to know it.

First acceptance and then action, reaction or denial ever. Accept our grief gives way to our happiness, and tip (temporarily) in oneself can turn to the future, but the sadness does not mean accepting sink into it. And we must distinguish between brooding and reflection.

How

tell?

The musings arising from the question why: why I made that decision?, Why it happened to me? The better question to see more clear is how: how to make the problem persist? That's thinking. The why is an intellectual question, how is observation. Knowing what my experience when I feel bad bringing clarity to address the problem.

moods can change multiple times in one day.

It is desirable to give every mood response it deserves, but we tend to give everyone the same answer. The right tool is introspection, to stop and wonder what we are feeling, but difficult, very difficult.

not discourage me, doctor.

A valuable resource is mindfulness meditation, ie be present in the experience of the moment we are living, without a filter, accepting what comes, no value judgments and no expectations.

Why outweigh the negative moods than positive?

Our brain is wired so captivates us more bad than good. When we are calm, facing the sea for example, let us enjoy it, we quickly come to mind a thought like "I ..." or "would have to ...". Instead of being in the present moment, we live in the anticipation or rumination.

There are situations and feelings to which we have no answer.

must accept that there is mystery, but we have answers for everything. The anxious person is the wrong supporting uncertainty. The tendency to worry is based on an intolerance of uncertainty.

"Worrying is ruminate about the future?

Right. Being worried is to have the mind full of problems in advance, busy and nervous. Leave There must be room for other moods, as the small joys of everyday life.

How should the concern?

Understanding that we can not control everything and that problems are part of life, accepting the uncertainty, but we prefer to fill the vacuum of uncertainty troubling acting or anticipating. We stick to what should be rather than what it is.

Teach me to facilitate positive moods.

Smile, we know that smiling increases positive moods. And faced with a problem, take a walk: instead of blocking the mood intellectually, physically move and take away. Move, talk with others and be trained in exercises of gratitude are powerful remedies.

How do you train the gratitude?

Every night, think of three nice moments of the day and realize that almost always those times they should be to others the friend who shared the food ... Osi has been happily listening to music, this time to thank the one composer who lived three centuries ago.

Brilliant idea.

think your happiness linked to other people gives more power and more security that experience gives us strength to fight against this existential loneliness.

Sweetness is another great tool.

True, we tend to think that sweetness, kindness, respect for others is good for those who receive it, but it is still better for the giver and is aware of the consequences of their actions.

Happiness do you learn?

50%, yes. Happiness is being more aware. It's turning the small moments of happiness being in enlightening the conscience. Knowing that happiness is fleeting and intermittent, namely to find within the sadness or misery for a moment to smile and assume the imperfection predisposes us to happiness.

I feel, therefore I am

moods, the subtle blend of emotions and thoughts accompany us at all times, sotto voce drive our actions and our relationship with the world. André is an expert in them, and in his magnificent book moods. Learning serenity (Kairos) the unfolding before us and invites us to listen, accept, become a mentor for our wisdom, especially if they are uncomfortable. I was stuck on page 49, in a simple reflection: "We get irritated when the heater breaks down, but we are delighted to have hot water every morning. And yet, we should do as an exercise of clarity and happiness! ".

The Tiffany And Co Christmas Commercial

an independence that is not such

seems that numbers ending in zero space cause a charm. So what we first saw when he arrived in 2000, which looked far for people born in the mid-twentieth century, and we have lived to celebrate two hundred years of the alleged Independence. The only people who have concluded their two hundred years of independence in the Americas, are Americans, because the date that corresponds to celebrate its independence from Britain. Such is its independence, not even occur to them to join Commonwealth.

Who came up with machine the idea of \u200b\u200ba date not so? Some time ago I read in another blog, a representative of the Chilean national syndicalism blamed liberals start the Republic in 1810. Why 1810 and not in 1818? Why promote it? Why university is not responsible for denying it through the media?

Statement Independence was in fact in 1818. So, why twice in our history we have insisted on this same lie? Perhaps, here is the origin of the policy of magical realism, which they love to English speakers. Policy away from reality and human nature, contrary to the Founding Fathers of the United States.

This September 18th we are celebrating all that is not independence, but our loyalty to the English Crown. The Minutes of the First Government reads:

" and example of what made the governor of Cadiz, put all his authority on the people to agree on its Government more worthy of your trust and more purpose to law enforcement and conservation of these domains to the rightful owner and unfortunate monarch, Don Ferdinand VII ... defend the kingdom until the last drop of their blood, preserve it Mr. Don Fernando VII and recognize the Supreme Council of Regency ... All military, leaders, bishops, religious and neighbors in the same act swore obedience and loyalty to this board and installed on behalf of Mr. Don Ferdinand VII, who always subject "

However, no one has explained why being imprisoned King Ferdinand VII by Napoleon, who put his brother Joseph Bonaparte, the power becomes the 'people', organized by Together. Why can not I take some other aristocrat or noble? The reason is that the English Crown was regulated medieval code known as Las Siete Partidas of Alfonso X . Indeed, the Act II Item No. 3 title 15 refers to the succession. It provides that in the absence of the king should establish a Board of Governors. It should be noted that the English Constitution of 1978 reflects that point yet. The short version of this Item, is that power comes from God, this is what happens to the people and finally reaches the monarch. As seen is the opposite Absolutism. We know that the word 'people' is a pipe dream if we are guided by methodological individualism.

When I was in high school, I liked that the historian Jaime Eyzaguirre rescued the theory on the origin of power to put it in counterpoint to the ideas of the French Enlightenment and absolutism. I also liked when I learned much later from the School of Salamanca, whose importance in the history of economic thought has been recognized by the liberal Friedrich von Hayek and Murray Rotbarth libertarian. At home, the only one who has rescued was the late Alvaro Bardon, who devoted a column. Former President Eduardo Frei Mariana's father mentioned to justify the overthrow of Allende.

What strikes me is that people always right to redeem the obligation to put the First Government: " to be the main subject of the Government and the representative body of the nation, order, peace and quiet public ... in demonstration of gratitude that was due to the generous people who are holding him at their head the government promises more happy, peace unalterable and permanent security kingdom. "

I think that the obligation was the first Board of Governors is in line with the lifestyle of the industrious and laborious hobbits of Tolkin.

can have democracy and freedom with order. Anybody can explain why the Founding Fathers of the United States did not consider Democrats?

The Best Malpractice Insurance For Rn

Aliens and the September 11, 1973

had planned long ago to comment on some of foreign judgments on Pinochet, to show how repeated clichés the left: the military and the victims, without realizing it. Has worked so well leftist propaganda, since the failure of his attempt to install a communist dictatorship with the Popular Unity government, who believe so to speak, describing the shadows in Plato's Cave Myth correspond to real objects. This In other words, do not realize that they are engaged in a kind of Matrix like in the movie of the same name. Thus, if the Old Left liberalism or Marxist-Leninist states that Pinochet had contact with little green men, foreigners are going right again as they did with the Rettig and Valech, without examination. Then know the views of former member of the Rettig Commission José Zalaquett on human rights violators , I do not doubt that the Rettig Report not serious. Knowing the same to the people who pretended to be tortured with Valech Report. How do members of this Commission were passed cat for free? I am convinced, as I said the late historian, Gonzalo Vial Correa, it is impossible that the committee has treated 30,000 cases in the time it took.

The left has tried to show that the military went against its own citizens, if not, the people, whether first military intervention, either later in the fight against terrorism between 1973 and 1990. The journalist Mario Spataro on "Pinochet: the 'incómodades" truths "but it is refuted, that when he had dropped the Allende regime," In an extensive tour of Santiago, Channel 13 showed marginal populations covered Chilean flags. " Just remember the words of counsel for the former CDE above: "The specificity of the human rights crimes committed by armed forces of order against the inhabitants of the country of belonging."

thing about Chile as same with Argentina. Some right-wing liberal or conservative alien love that killed 30,000 people in Argentina, where the report says Sabato who died 8000. Of course, that does not count the dead they left terrorism in times of Isabel Peron , ie democracy. Thus, they become useless fools.

An example of misinformation that prevails in Europe, one you can see in the newspaper columnist LibertadDigital, José Carlos Rodríguez : "Remember that the dictatorship began to be done in exact correspondence economy policy and socialism by other means. Only when the country, and with it the scheme itself was threatened, the government ended up in the technical. With luck that they were a group of young people coming from the University of Chicago with many ideas and one: liberalize U.S. economy. " False. Who had the vision that would require an economic plan to bring the crisis to Chile where he was dragged Popular Unity was Admiral Tobirio Merino Castro, who retired commissioned officer Richard Kelly. This, in turn, was able to bring together young economists in the city of Viña del Mar at the time of the Allende government. This product was born 'The Brick'. Then, when the military government was installed, was Admiral Merino, who convinced Pinochet's Chicago Boys and the commitment to the market. Well, there recall that in the Army had many officers believe that the socialist economy was still the solution. Meanwhile, the opposition Popular Unity did not know how to pull the country out of the impasse, which led to the socialist government. In short, what English says José Carlos Rodríguez does not stop being a fantasy, a wish. After further talks, " is uncomfortable about the success of Chile, because the model began to forge under a brutal dictatorship." Equally to this columnist likes to attribute the " crimes are counted three thousand ", forgetting where there was a struggle between 1973 and 1978, against terrorism. He concludes elsewhere: " has managed to establish a democracy after a brutal dictatorship has been able to look forward rather than backwards, without looking for it somewhere else on the crimes of the Pinochet regime ." No But the silly useless foreign right, they say nothing of the crimes on the left to terrorism, which began in democracy. The political violence that began in democracy left only affected less than 1% of the population had in 1973 either had in early 1990. And thus speak of 'brutal dictatorship', 'criminal dictatorship', 'excessive violence' and 'brutal dictatorship, "among other expressions. Moreover, if much of the citizenry, not to mention the entelechy 'the people', through the Resolution of the Chamber of Deputies called for military intervention as ultima ratio. After all, former President Eduardo Frei in the Act of Rivera says: "This problem can only be solved with guns."

For its part, the Argentine economist Alberto Benegas Lynch to rebel September 11, based on three aspects. Note that using the word 'rebellion', no coup to refer to the military and then civilian uprising " First, the justification of the right of resistance so dear to the liberal traditions, at one time from Sydney and Locke, the Declaration Independence U.S. emphasizes that if any form of government goes against the freedoms of individuals "is on the right of people to alter or abolish it and institute a new government." The same had happened in England with the rebellion against James II and later against English despotism in South America or the Allied invasion against Hitler. " Something similar

José Piñera said in his book 'A House Divide. "

In the same tone of Rodriguez, but more objective is the Mexican Ricardo Valenzuela, who said: " Thus began a chapter of our history to face with passion the international community over the next two decades: the iron dictatorship of a man who, politically, he would consider the torturer of dissidents and Chilean democracy and, in a confusing contrast, the architect of the economic miracle Andean country now classifies it as the only developed in Latin America. " Note the term ' he would consider opposing executioner. " This is a typical expression of the left, even if not leftist Valenzuela, referring to the fight against subversion. Or the one that repeats the pursuers for thinking differently.

Another example of I speak, it illustrates the American conservative journalist, Robert D. Kaplan in ' The return of old: the politics of the warriors ': " The Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, on the other hand, used excessive violence and, therefore, has no virtue Machiavellians." I think if you had studied the Civil War of 1891, know what violence is excessive. If I had known the views of the Chilean Socialist leader, Clodomiro Almeyda, who said he would have a civil war as the English, which cost a million lives, appreciate the military to reduce mortality, " I am inclined to believe it is more likely take the form of a revolutionary civil war, the English fashion, with foreign intervention, but of course faster and acute. " Naturally, the blame lies with Pinochet.

not know what bothers them more that the military has made a liberal economic and political transformation, while fighting the insurgency. Which means, of course, killed by one side or another Pinochet or associating with liberalism or right. Pinochet simply made a decision and hit long before Thatcher and Reagan. Nobody said it was easy. What I am certain that foreigners like Rodriguez and Kaplan, if you will be moving on a journey through time, without the knowledge you have now, would not know how to get us out of the impasse reached by the country. The easiest thing is to be a general after the battle.

means right because people are so uninformed, as the British journalist Paul Johnson clarifies: " But to avoid the transformation of Chile into a communist satellite, the general won the furious hatred of the Soviet Union, as propaganda machine successfully demonized him among intellectuals around the world. It was the ultimate triumph of the KGB before vanishing into the dustbin of history. But Pinochet remains a hero for me because I know the facts . " Few are brave as the English to defend Pinochet.

thank the military that we have saved from Communist slavery, which by the way, the current progress is not still refuses to recognize its past totalitarian, fascist and terrorist guerracivilista.

Green Dot On Computer Screen

For now ... Common Places

personal issues and their own path now leads me to other roads and maintenance of the blog strikes me as a daunting task. Limited to bind different videos or songs I like is all that for a few months, I have and I can hold for the moment, although I intend to share some of my creation and reflection.