seems that numbers ending in zero space cause a charm. So what we first saw when he arrived in 2000, which looked far for people born in the mid-twentieth century, and we have lived to celebrate two hundred years of the alleged Independence. The only people who have concluded their two hundred years of independence in the Americas, are Americans, because the date that corresponds to celebrate its independence from Britain. Such is its independence, not even occur to them to join Commonwealth.
Who came up with machine the idea of \u200b\u200ba date not so? Some time ago I read in another blog, a representative of the Chilean national syndicalism blamed liberals start the Republic in 1810. Why 1810 and not in 1818? Why promote it? Why university is not responsible for denying it through the media?
Statement Independence was in fact in 1818. So, why twice in our history we have insisted on this same lie? Perhaps, here is the origin of the policy of magical realism, which they love to English speakers. Policy away from reality and human nature, contrary to the Founding Fathers of the United States.
This September 18th we are celebrating all that is not independence, but our loyalty to the English Crown. The Minutes of the First Government reads:
" and example of what made the governor of Cadiz, put all his authority on the people to agree on its Government more worthy of your trust and more purpose to law enforcement and conservation of these domains to the rightful owner and unfortunate monarch, Don Ferdinand VII ... defend the kingdom until the last drop of their blood, preserve it Mr. Don Fernando VII and recognize the Supreme Council of Regency ... All military, leaders, bishops, religious and neighbors in the same act swore obedience and loyalty to this board and installed on behalf of Mr. Don Ferdinand VII, who always subject "
However, no one has explained why being imprisoned King Ferdinand VII by Napoleon, who put his brother Joseph Bonaparte, the power becomes the 'people', organized by Together. Why can not I take some other aristocrat or noble? The reason is that the English Crown was regulated medieval code known as Las Siete Partidas of Alfonso X . Indeed, the Act II Item No. 3 title 15 refers to the succession. It provides that in the absence of the king should establish a Board of Governors. It should be noted that the English Constitution of 1978 reflects that point yet. The short version of this Item, is that power comes from God, this is what happens to the people and finally reaches the monarch. As seen is the opposite Absolutism. We know that the word 'people' is a pipe dream if we are guided by methodological individualism.
When I was in high school, I liked that the historian Jaime Eyzaguirre rescued the theory on the origin of power to put it in counterpoint to the ideas of the French Enlightenment and absolutism. I also liked when I learned much later from the School of Salamanca, whose importance in the history of economic thought has been recognized by the liberal Friedrich von Hayek and Murray Rotbarth libertarian. At home, the only one who has rescued was the late Alvaro Bardon, who devoted a column. Former President Eduardo Frei Mariana's father mentioned to justify the overthrow of Allende.
What strikes me is that people always right to redeem the obligation to put the First Government: " to be the main subject of the Government and the representative body of the nation, order, peace and quiet public ... in demonstration of gratitude that was due to the generous people who are holding him at their head the government promises more happy, peace unalterable and permanent security kingdom. "
I think that the obligation was the first Board of Governors is in line with the lifestyle of the industrious and laborious hobbits of Tolkin.
can have democracy and freedom with order. Anybody can explain why the Founding Fathers of the United States did not consider Democrats?
0 comments:
Post a Comment