had planned long ago to comment on some of foreign judgments on Pinochet, to show how repeated clichés the left: the military and the victims, without realizing it. Has worked so well leftist propaganda, since the failure of his attempt to install a communist dictatorship with the Popular Unity government, who believe so to speak, describing the shadows in Plato's Cave Myth correspond to real objects. This In other words, do not realize that they are engaged in a kind of Matrix like in the movie of the same name. Thus, if the Old Left liberalism or Marxist-Leninist states that Pinochet had contact with little green men, foreigners are going right again as they did with the Rettig and Valech, without examination. Then know the views of former member of the Rettig Commission José Zalaquett on human rights violators , I do not doubt that the Rettig Report not serious. Knowing the same to the people who pretended to be tortured with Valech Report. How do members of this Commission were passed cat for free? I am convinced, as I said the late historian, Gonzalo Vial Correa, it is impossible that the committee has treated 30,000 cases in the time it took.
The left has tried to show that the military went against its own citizens, if not, the people, whether first military intervention, either later in the fight against terrorism between 1973 and 1990. The journalist Mario Spataro on "Pinochet: the 'incómodades" truths "but it is refuted, that when he had dropped the Allende regime," In an extensive tour of Santiago, Channel 13 showed marginal populations covered Chilean flags. " Just remember the words of counsel for the former CDE above: "The specificity of the human rights crimes committed by armed forces of order against the inhabitants of the country of belonging."
The left has tried to show that the military went against its own citizens, if not, the people, whether first military intervention, either later in the fight against terrorism between 1973 and 1990. The journalist Mario Spataro on "Pinochet: the 'incómodades" truths "but it is refuted, that when he had dropped the Allende regime," In an extensive tour of Santiago, Channel 13 showed marginal populations covered Chilean flags. " Just remember the words of counsel for the former CDE above: "The specificity of the human rights crimes committed by armed forces of order against the inhabitants of the country of belonging."
thing about Chile as same with Argentina. Some right-wing liberal or conservative alien love that killed 30,000 people in Argentina, where the report says Sabato who died 8000. Of course, that does not count the dead they left terrorism in times of Isabel Peron , ie democracy. Thus, they become useless fools.
An example of misinformation that prevails in Europe, one you can see in the newspaper columnist LibertadDigital, José Carlos Rodríguez : "Remember that the dictatorship began to be done in exact correspondence economy policy and socialism by other means. Only when the country, and with it the scheme itself was threatened, the government ended up in the technical. With luck that they were a group of young people coming from the University of Chicago with many ideas and one: liberalize U.S. economy. " False. Who had the vision that would require an economic plan to bring the crisis to Chile where he was dragged Popular Unity was Admiral Tobirio Merino Castro, who retired commissioned officer Richard Kelly. This, in turn, was able to bring together young economists in the city of Viña del Mar at the time of the Allende government. This product was born 'The Brick'. Then, when the military government was installed, was Admiral Merino, who convinced Pinochet's Chicago Boys and the commitment to the market. Well, there recall that in the Army had many officers believe that the socialist economy was still the solution. Meanwhile, the opposition Popular Unity did not know how to pull the country out of the impasse, which led to the socialist government. In short, what English says José Carlos Rodríguez does not stop being a fantasy, a wish. After further talks, " is uncomfortable about the success of Chile, because the model began to forge under a brutal dictatorship." Equally to this columnist likes to attribute the " crimes are counted three thousand ", forgetting where there was a struggle between 1973 and 1978, against terrorism. He concludes elsewhere: " has managed to establish a democracy after a brutal dictatorship has been able to look forward rather than backwards, without looking for it somewhere else on the crimes of the Pinochet regime ." No But the silly useless foreign right, they say nothing of the crimes on the left to terrorism, which began in democracy. The political violence that began in democracy left only affected less than 1% of the population had in 1973 either had in early 1990. And thus speak of 'brutal dictatorship', 'criminal dictatorship', 'excessive violence' and 'brutal dictatorship, "among other expressions. Moreover, if much of the citizenry, not to mention the entelechy 'the people', through the Resolution of the Chamber of Deputies called for military intervention as ultima ratio. After all, former President Eduardo Frei in the Act of Rivera says: "This problem can only be solved with guns."
For its part, the Argentine economist Alberto Benegas Lynch to rebel September 11, based on three aspects. Note that using the word 'rebellion', no coup to refer to the military and then civilian uprising " First, the justification of the right of resistance so dear to the liberal traditions, at one time from Sydney and Locke, the Declaration Independence U.S. emphasizes that if any form of government goes against the freedoms of individuals "is on the right of people to alter or abolish it and institute a new government." The same had happened in England with the rebellion against James II and later against English despotism in South America or the Allied invasion against Hitler. " Something similar
José Piñera said in his book 'A House Divide. "
José Piñera said in his book 'A House Divide. "
In the same tone of Rodriguez, but more objective is the Mexican Ricardo Valenzuela, who said: " Thus began a chapter of our history to face with passion the international community over the next two decades: the iron dictatorship of a man who, politically, he would consider the torturer of dissidents and Chilean democracy and, in a confusing contrast, the architect of the economic miracle Andean country now classifies it as the only developed in Latin America. " Note the term ' he would consider opposing executioner. " This is a typical expression of the left, even if not leftist Valenzuela, referring to the fight against subversion. Or the one that repeats the pursuers for thinking differently.
Another example of I speak, it illustrates the American conservative journalist, Robert D. Kaplan in ' The return of old: the politics of the warriors ': " The Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, on the other hand, used excessive violence and, therefore, has no virtue Machiavellians." I think if you had studied the Civil War of 1891, know what violence is excessive. If I had known the views of the Chilean Socialist leader, Clodomiro Almeyda, who said he would have a civil war as the English, which cost a million lives, appreciate the military to reduce mortality, " I am inclined to believe it is more likely take the form of a revolutionary civil war, the English fashion, with foreign intervention, but of course faster and acute. " Naturally, the blame lies with Pinochet.
not know what bothers them more that the military has made a liberal economic and political transformation, while fighting the insurgency. Which means, of course, killed by one side or another Pinochet or associating with liberalism or right. Pinochet simply made a decision and hit long before Thatcher and Reagan. Nobody said it was easy. What I am certain that foreigners like Rodriguez and Kaplan, if you will be moving on a journey through time, without the knowledge you have now, would not know how to get us out of the impasse reached by the country. The easiest thing is to be a general after the battle.
means right because people are so uninformed, as the British journalist Paul Johnson clarifies: " But to avoid the transformation of Chile into a communist satellite, the general won the furious hatred of the Soviet Union, as propaganda machine successfully demonized him among intellectuals around the world. It was the ultimate triumph of the KGB before vanishing into the dustbin of history. But Pinochet remains a hero for me because I know the facts . " Few are brave as the English to defend Pinochet.
thank the military that we have saved from Communist slavery, which by the way, the current progress is not still refuses to recognize its past totalitarian, fascist and terrorist guerracivilista.
means right because people are so uninformed, as the British journalist Paul Johnson clarifies: " But to avoid the transformation of Chile into a communist satellite, the general won the furious hatred of the Soviet Union, as propaganda machine successfully demonized him among intellectuals around the world. It was the ultimate triumph of the KGB before vanishing into the dustbin of history. But Pinochet remains a hero for me because I know the facts . " Few are brave as the English to defend Pinochet.
thank the military that we have saved from Communist slavery, which by the way, the current progress is not still refuses to recognize its past totalitarian, fascist and terrorist guerracivilista.
0 comments:
Post a Comment